AMD Radeon RX Vega Benchmark Review: Vega 64 and Vega 56 Tested

Jump To:

Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1 (also known as BF1) is the fifteenth installment in the Battlefield Series developed by DICE and published by EA. The game is set during World War I. It was released world wide on October 21, 2016. The singleplayer campaign of Battlefield 1 takes place across six different “War Stories” which revolve around different people in different aspects of the Great War in campaigns such as the Italian Alps and the deserts of Arabia. We benchmark in Through Mud and Blood, which is the second mission in singleplayer campaign. Taking place late in the war, the player assumes the role of Danny Edwards, a British recruit joining the crew of a Mark V Landship named Black Bess as their new tank driver. New to the war and inexperienced in driving the unreliable vehicle, Edwards is given a trial by fire with his first mission: punch through the German line at Cambrai with a broken tank and a crew that has no trust in him.

BF1 Through Mud and Blood

Battlefield 1 features the Frostbite 3 game engine and has very good graphics with tons of destructibles. Maps also now feature dynamic weather systems, affecting combat in various ways; for example, The St. Quentin Scar can either start as a clear, sunny day, a dark, foggy day, or in the middle of a rainstorm, and switch between them during the round.

Battlefield 1 Video Card Settings

Battlefield 1 Advanced Video Card Settings

We tested BF1 at 1920 x 1080 with the ‘Ultra’ graphics quality preset in DX12 with the GPU Memory Restriction turned off. We also disabled VSync.

Benchmark Results: Battlefield 1 is pretty tough on graphics cards with the Ultra image quality preset, but we were still able to average 131.5 FPS on 1080P on the AMD Radeon RX VEGA 64 and 114.3 FPS on the Radeon RX VEGA 56. When we cranked up the screen resolution to 2560×1440 our performance dropped down to 100 and 88 FPS, respectively. The numbers produced by the Radeon RX VEGA 64 were above the GeForce GTX 1080 cards and we were close to 60 FPS on average on the VEGA RX 64 at 4K on BF1!

Print
Jump To:
  • chrisday85

    Ok, here’s some things ticking me off: The Vega 64 is literally twice the gflops, and twice the memory bandwidth of the RX 580. The gap from the Vega 64 to RX 580 should be huge. The GTX 1060 to 1080 may be basically as large Gflops wise, but is minimal memory bandwidth wise. And what do you notice in these benchmarks? What the bloody hell is going on? The Vega is a new architecture, it’s supposed to be better in all sorts of ways. Yet here we see the same architecture generation from Nvidia performing much better in line with the increases. Allow me to demonstrate:

    Cross multiply Nvidia GTX 1060 Gears 4 1080, using the RX 580 and you find the AMD if scaling as well, should be average 157 in the frame rate, before accounting for any leap from the new architecture. What does it turn in? 128. Nvidia is scaling better in the same generation than AMD is in the new one?

    Fallout IV: It should be 125 if it scaled as well as the NVIDIA card. It is instead 112.

    Ghost Recon:

    95 instead of 106

    Battlefield:

    131 instead of 153

    Deus Ex:

    112 instead of 125.

    Grand Theft Auto is the only one it scales a tiny bit better.

    It’s scaling WORSE in DX 12 than it is in DX 11 I might add, do the math.

    I bought the Vega 64 and I have to say I’m disappointed. I’m hoping these beta drivers are the reason, because this is absurd, and I might add, the card gets to 86c unless I turn the fans to “wind turbine” as well. I also seem to be having an issue with Batman Arkham Knight in frame rate, which I’m just going to chalk up to some weird sort of glitch, because it’s nowhere near where benchmarks peg it. This has got to be one of AMD’s most disappointing launches of a new architecture I have seen.

  • Stephen

    test system, 6950x ivy bridge-e? error

    • Nathan Kirsch

      haha, winner! Fixed and thank you.

  • Sean Kumar Sinha

    Was hoping for a card that’d make NVidia push Volta and create a realistic GPU war. Unfortunately, we got cards that compete with stuff that NVidia has had out for over a year and that draw too much power, in comparison. These are good cards, for sure, but they are a year too late. Vega 56 seems like a good option for some 1080P Freesync gaming, though.

  • James Yarno

    Ethereum hash rate?