Crucial MX100 256GB & 512GB SSD Review


CrystalDiskMark & Anvil IOPS

CrystalDiskMark is a small benchmark utility for drives and enables rapid measurement of sequential and random read/write speeds. Note that CDM only supports Native Command Queuing (NCQ) with a queue depth of 32 (as noted) for the last listed benchmark score. This can skew some results in favor of controllers that also do not support NCQ.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 – Intel Z77 Platform

Crucial MX100 256GB CrystalDiskMark

Crucial MX100 512GB CrystalDiskMark

Benchmark Results: Just like on the AS-SSD benchmark, we see strong scores from both drives with the 512GB drive hitting significantly better write numbers and overall results that are solid.

CrystalDiskMark Grid

There’s a relatively new benchmark called Anvil Storage Utilities that is in beta but close to production. It’s a very powerful tool that measures performance through a variety of tests which can be customized. Since some of the tests more or less duplicate what we get from other benchmarks we use already, we decided to use the IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) testing on 4kb file sizes at a queue depth of 32. IOPS performance is something SSD makers tout quite a bit but we generally don’t do a lot of IOPS testing because frankly a lot of users can’t relate to IOPS metrics as well and it tends to be more meaningful to the enterprise/server crowd. Still, it is another performance indicator with relevance and while some drives post good MB/s numbers, their IOPS scores aren’t always commensurate which this test will prove out.

MX100 256GB:

Crucial MX100 256GB IOPS READ Crucial MX100 256GB IOPS WRITES

MX100 512GB:

Crucial MX100 512GB IOPS READ Crucial MX100 512GB IOPS WRITES

Benchmark Results: IOPS scores are very strong with writes between 74K and 84K and reads each around 100K. These numbers compare very favorably with the other drives we’ve tested.

Crucial MX100 IOPS Chart.