|LG Optimus G Pro||LG Optimus G||Galaxy S3|
|AnTuTu Battery Test v3.4||462||–||–|
|SunSpider 1.0 (ms)||1281||1115||2,330|
|3DMark Ice Storm||9287||7759||3559|
SunSpider: lower scores are better. Higher is better on all other benchmarks.
The LG Optimus G Pro was doing a great job in our CPU benchmarks when compared to the Samsung Galaxy S3 and the LG Optimus G. In Quadrant 2.1.1 the Optimus G Pro scored 9328, 1525 points faster the the Optimus G and 5552 points faster than the Samsung S3! In AnTuTu the Pro scored 19939 which is faster than the LG Optimus G score of 19752, and worlds faster than the 8811 scored by the Galaxy S3! The LG Optimus G Pro didn’t fare as well as I had hoped in the browser tests like the SunSpider 1.0. In SunSpider the LG Optimus G was slightly faster with a time of 1115ms while the Optimus G Pro scored 1281ms. The same pattern emerged for Peacekeeper, and Browsermark 2.0. 3DMark Ice Storm was in favor of the LG Optimus G Pro once again though. The Optimus G Pro scored 9287, the Optimus G scored 7759, and the Samsung Galaxy S3 scored 3559.