BIOSTAR TA990FXE AMD 990FX Motherboard Review

By

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat DirectX 11 Benchmark

Stalker Call of Pripyat DX11 Performance Benchmark

The events of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat unfold shortly after the end of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl following the ending in which Strelok destroys the C-Consciousness. Having discovered the open path to the Zone’s center, the government decides to stage a large-scale operation to take control of the Chernobyl nuclear plant.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat utilizes the XRAY 1.6 Engine, allowing advanced modern graphical features through the use of DirectX 11 to be fully integrated; one outstanding feature being the inclusion of real-time GPU tessellation. Regions and maps feature photo realistic scenes of the region it is made to represent. There is also extensive support for older versions of DirectX, meaning that Call of Pripyat is also compatible with older DirectX 8, 9, 10 and 10.1 graphics cards.

The game S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: CoP has no internal benchmarking tools built into the game engine, but they do have a standalone benchmark available that we used for our testing purposes. The screen capture above shows the main window of the benchmark with our settings. Notice we are running Enhanced Full Dynamic Lighting “DX11” as our renderer.

Stalker Call of Pripyat DX11 Performance Benchmark

In order to give our XFX Radeon HD 6950 a workout on our systems we cranked the image quality preset to Ultra.

Stalker Call of Pripyat DX11 Performance Benchmark

We also ran the Multisample Anti-Aliasing at 4x and Tessellation is enabled.

BIOSTAR TA990FXE S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call of Pripyat Benchmark Results

Benchmark Results: The BIOSTAR TA990FXE was slightly slower in the S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat benchmark today than the other ‘Bulldozer’ systems. At 1280×1024 the BIOSTAR TA990FXE was able to average 101.3 frames per second which was 1.5% behind the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7. Cranking the resolution up to 1920×1080 the BIOSTAR TA990FXE managed an average of 72.5 frames per second which is only 1% behind the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7.

Comments are closed.