SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB SSD Review

Jump To:

Real World Copy & Boot Tests

File Copy Times Via Teracopy 2.27:

One of the most common operations performed on a PC is moving/copying files. Using a free application called Teracopy, we copied large numbers of two file types from one folder to another on the same drive. Teracopy allows us to objectively measure the time of transfer and using the same drive prevents other devices from tainting the outcome. The operation requires the drive to perform both sustained read and writes simultaneously. The first set of files is a 5GB collection of JPG’s of variable size and compression levels with a few movie (.MOV) files thrown in for good measure since most cameras now take video as well as stills. The second is a collection of MP3 files of various sizes which totals 5GB collectively. These file types were chosen due to their wide use and mixture of file sizes and compression levels.

SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB MP3 Copy

Install Results: The only drive in our comparison slower than the SanDisk Ultra Plus on the 5GB file copy was the budget friendly Kingston V300 drive. However, even the fastest drive in our comparison was 7 seconds faster on the JPG copy and 16 seconds on the MP3 copy.

SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB FILECOPY CHART

Windows Boot Times Via BootRacer:

Windows start up/shutdown time is always something people are interested in and we haven’t done it in a while because there was little variation with the majority of the SSDs. We recently began using an application called BootRacer to objectively measure the startup times of the drives. All of the instances of Windows were identical and freshly installed with only the video driver installed.

SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB Bootracer

SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB Boot Chart

Test Results: Little separation in the boot scores with the SanDisk Ultra Plus falling right in the middle of all the other drives listed.

Jump To:

Comments are closed.