Gigabyte Brix Pro Review – GB-BXi7-4770R

Jump To:

802.11ac Wireless Testing and System Boot Times

close-test

When it comes to wireless performance the we used LAN Speed Test to check the performance of the included AzureWave AW-CB161H mini PCIe card 802.11ac Wireless Card. We used a desktop with Gigabit Ethernet to run LAN Speed Server that was hard connected to the ASUS RT-AC66U 802.11AC wireless router on the 5GHz band and moved it 15-feet away from the NUC test machine to check out performance with both 1MB and 100MB packets. We ran LAN Speed Test on the Gigabyte Brix Pro to test the throughput and found roughly 225 Mbps average write speeds and 219 Mbps average read speeds.

far-test

We then moved the router 35 feet away and retested the wireless performance. Performance was expected to decrease and it did as we were now averaging about 150 Mbps write and 125 Mbps read. You can use Intel 7260 series wireless cards in the Gigabyte Brix Pro if you wanted to go with a difference card.  The write speeds on the AzureWave AW-CB161H are solid, but the read speeds are about 100Mbps lower than what we get on the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Card.

bootracer

The last performance test that we wanted to run was Bootracer 4.6 to see how fast the system is able to boot Windows 8 64-bit. We were happy it takes just 7 seconds to get to the logon screen and about 28 seconds to get the desktop fully loaded!

Print
Jump To:
  • Alexander Reusch

    Hi,

    what is this good for?

    http://unitedserver.de/temp_images/gigabyte.jpg

    Kind regards
    Alex

  • Felipe

    Is it possible to have both SSD and a 2.5 HDD at the same time?

  • Sin Sentido Comun

    WOuld be nice to test audio software, I am very interested but noise can an issue, at the same time audio apps doesn’t consume much video power (or not one at all) so it might not push the GPU too much,

  • KvinlonWeldon

    Intel Core i7 Quad-Core Best Buy
    GOTO:
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00CO8TBQ0/?tag=2014-2-20

    Intel Core i7-4770K Quad-Core Desktop Processor (3.5 GHz, 8 MB Cache, Intel HD graphics, BX80646I74770K) Everyday Low Prices BX80646I74770K This On Intel Expert Advice: Call, Chat, or Email

    Intel, Intel Core i7 Quad-Core Best Buy, Intel BX80646I74770K, BX80646I74770K Intel

    http://www.hisosale.com/5e9jy/products/798/more/intel-core-i7-quad-core-best-buy

  • basroil

    Any chance you have a Kinect for Windows sensor and are willing to try out the system compared to something like a GTX 680? If that thing can get solid 30fps in 3d mapping mode, it will be THE robotics controller platform everyone is using.

    • legitreviews

      I do not have the Kinect for windows sensor and I know that has different features than the normal Xbox 360 Connect that are all over. Anyway to use the Xbox version?

      • basroil

        There’s nothing technically stopping you if you have the USB adapter, though the results might get wonky. Kinect Fusion doesn’t inherently use any of the Kinect for Windows features unless you enable them, so as long as you don’t try texture mapping or near mode it should work. Just remember to up the resolution (voxel density) until you hit just under 2gb vram use.

        • Peter

          Did you have the time to try Brix with the kinect sensor?

        • basroil

          Still no budget for brix, perhaps in another 6mo (though 960m version would be out by then)

  • Internet

    Why do you mention BIOS repeatedly in the review? This is a UEFI implemntation, not a BIOS. But you call it “UEFI BIOS” to really get things wrong. Why?

    • Internet

      Perhaps you can merge this in with the previous note?

      Watts dissipated in use isn’t “TDP” – TDP is Thermal Design Power. You can’t “hit a TDP of 85w” during use; the design power is still 65W. You are instead generating 85w in the form of heat, but not generating a “TDP.”

      I won’t go in depth about the editorial problems with this piece… nearly every page has some flaw, including missing half of a paragraph on page 3.

      Also: Your KeyShot 4.3 is unregistered, and not for commerical use. But the purpose of these reviews is ad revenue, isn’t it?

      I don’t really get what’s legit about repeated misuse of terminology.
      This article is quite poorly written and I do not believe the author possesses
      the knowledge necessary to write about these topics.