Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB SSD Review

Jump To:

Neutron GTX – Real World Tests

File Copy Times Via Teracopy:

One of the most common operations performed on a PC is moving/copying files. Using a free application called Teracopy, we copied large numbers of two file types from one folder to another on the same drive. Teracopy allows us to objectively measure the time of transfer and using the same drive prevents other devices from tainting the outcome. The operation requires the drive to perform both sustained read and writes simultaneously. The first set of files is a 5GB collection of JPG’s of variable size and compression levels with a few movie (.MOV) files thrown in for good measure since most cameras now take video as well as stills. The second is a collection of MP3 files of various sizes which totals 5GB collectively. These file types were chosen due to their wide use and mixture of file sizes and compression levels.

Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB JPG Copy

Install Results: Unsurprisingly, the Neutron GTX kicked ass in the file copy test since the data is a variable mix of compressible and incompressible data that causes some slowdown on the SandForce drives but not here.

Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB FILECOPY CHART

Windows Boot Times Via BootRacer:

Windows start up/shutdown time is always something people are interested in and we haven’t done it in a while because there was little variation with the majority of the SSDs. We recently began using an application called BootRacer to objectively measure the startup times of the drives. All of the instances of Windows were identical and freshly installed with only the video driver installed.

Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB Bootracer

Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB Boot Chart

Test Results: Boot times tied that of the recently reviewed Intel 335 Series SSD and one second faster on each time score than the non-GTX Neutron.

We’ll wrap this with a look at the total drive capacity and our final thoughts.

Jump To:

Comments are closed.