Legit Memory Reviews
6-Way 1GB DDR500 Round-up
|Product:||1GB Dual Channel Memory Kits|
|Date:||Fri, Sep 19, 2003 - 09:00 AM|
|Written By:||Nathan Kirsch -|
How Do We Define Stable Memory?
Have you ever run across a review website that reviews a product and shows a couple amazing scores and gives it an award? Sure you do as most review sites do just that, but how stable was it? I would be willing to bet that most sites don't know what stable memory is and therefore give fairly inaccurate results. Yes, I hate to break the news, but there is more than just running a memory bandwidth test and calling memory stable. That is why Legit Reviews went the extra mile (over 150 testing hours in our case) to figure out which brand of DDR500 memory is worth the $300-$500 you are about to spend on it.
Ever wonder what the memory companies use to test their modules? So did we, and we found out that they use the RAM Stress Test Professional (R.S.T. Pro). Well, one thing led to another and we went out and picked up the R.S.T. Pro to use in this review. What is the R.S.T. Pro? It is a Self-Booting, Operating System Independent memory diagnostic card for exercising and validating RAM. The R.S.T. Pro runs all tests in protected mode which can completely and thoroughly test up to 64 gigabytes of memory. This utility provides users the options of running sophisticated test patterns to detect hard to find memory errors, which are not detected by other test software.
While using the R.S.T. Pro we were able to find memory errors that other testing methods could not find or reproduce. Since we want and encourage our readers to follow up our testing on their own we also used the free testing program called Memtest86 which is a stand alone memory test for x86 architecture computers that boots off a floppy disk. We will go ahead and show the actual errors detected on Memtest86, as it is free and everyone can check into it.
We would also like to note that the errors found in test 5 and 8 do not mean the memory is faulty. As the Memtest86 homepage states: "Errors from this test [5 & 8] are not used to calculate BadRAM patterns."
We also ran Prime95 while running loops of 3dmark2001 for a minimum of six hours to make sure that under hours of stress and heat buildup that the modules were truly stable.
We considered memory stable when it was able to run 1 extended pass of Memtest86, six hours of Prime95/3dmark testing and ran without locking up while running all tests on the RSTPro. Many consider if any errors are found using the RSTPro or Memtest86 testing methods the memory has failed. Since 3 of our 6 modules would have failed from testing the modules at default timings we kept going.
By this combination of tests and the fact that we are using retail bought memory we feel that this review is the most accurate testing ever completed in terms of memory stability. Sure, not everyone will agree with our stability testing methods, but not everyone can afford the cost of a review like this nor the time that went into this testing.
Bottom Line: There is no industry standard for professional reviewers, but hopefully this review will cause other professional reviewers to change their methods and ways of looking at memory.
Next Page - Performance:
Page 1 - Introduction:
Page 2 - The Modules:
Page 3 - Testing Methods:
Page 4 - Performance:
Page 5 - Benchmarking:
Page 6 - Overclocking:
Page 7 - Conclusion: