Legit Processor Reviews
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor Review
|Product:||AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor (CPU)|
|Date:||Tue, Jan 10, 2006 - 09:00 AM|
|Written By:||Nathan Kirsch -|
3DMark 2005 v1.2.0
Futuremark; 3DMark 2005 v1.2.0:
3DMark05 is best suited for the latest generation of DirectX 9.0 graphics cards. It is the first benchmark to require a DirectX9.0 compliant hardware with support for Pixel Shaders 2.0 or higher! By combining high quality 3D tests, CPU tests, feature tests, image quality tools, and much more, 3DMark05 is a premium benchmark for evaluating the latest generation of gaming hardware.
Moving over to 3DMark 05 version 1.2.0 we can see how dual core performs in a lightly threaded application. Here we see the Intel Pentium 955 Processor Extreme Edition take the lead for Intel, but it wasn't enough to catch the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or the brand new AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 processors. The overall score showed the single cored 4800+ in a dead heat with the dual core FX-60.
Looking at CPU Test #1 we can see that the AMD 4800+ with it's higher frequency (2.8GHz) single core beats our the dual core FX-60 by just 0.1 frames per second. The Intel Pentium 955 Extreme Edition has a good lead over the other Intel EE's and the 3.8GHz Intel Pentium 4 670, but still half a fps behind.
Taking a quick look at the CPU Test details from the 3DMark05 test runs it can be seen that the Intel 955 and AMD FX-60 processors are close with only a 0.2 Frame Per Second (FPS) difference between the two in CPU test #2.
Next Page - Sandra 2005 SR3
Page 1 - David versus Goliath No More
Page 2 - Test System
Page 3 - 3DMark 2005 v1.2.0
Page 4 - Sandra 2005 SR3
Page 5 - World Bench 5
Page 6 - World Bench 5 Continued
Page 7 - World Bench 5 Continued Again
Page 8 - Cinebench 2003
Page 9 - Super Pi Mod
Page 10 - F.E.A.R. Game Testing
Page 11 - Quake 4 Game Testing
Page 12 - DOOM 3 Game Testing
Page 13 - Conclusions