AMD Ryzen 3 1200 and Ryzen 3 1300X Processor Review

Jump To:

3DMark & Cinebench

Futuremark 3DMark 2.2.3509 – link

3DMark is a popular gaming performance benchmark that includes everything you need to benchmark your PC whether you’re gaming on a desktop PC, laptop, notebook, or a tablet. 3DMark includes seven benchmark tests and we’ll be running ‘Sky Diver’ that is aimed at gaming laptops and mid-range PCs.

Maxon Cinebench R15.038 – link 

CINEBENCH is a real-world cross platform test suite that evaluates your computer’s performance capabilities. CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software Cinema 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Iron Man 3, Oblivion, Life of Pi or Prometheus and many more.

3DMark and Cinebench Benchmarks Results Summary: The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 and Ryzen 3 1300X processors did okay in these two benchmarks. The Ryzen 3 1300X turned in a multi-CPU score of 560 points and the Ryzen 3 scored 476 points on Cinebench R15. Those solid scores put both processors ahead of the Intel Core i3-7350K dual-core processor in Cinebench. When it comes to 3DMark Firestrike we found the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X was able to beat the Core i3-7350K, but the Ryzen 3 1200 wasn’t and just happened to be the slowest desktop processor on that chart with regards to the physics score. The overall score had the Ryzen 3 1200 ahead of several processors, including the Core i7-7350K.

Print
Jump To:
  • Stop duplication

    Duplication of cores starts now, stop duplicating cores with fastest processors from intel. Intel coffelake gets it right. Switch to core i3 quad core processor, no more duplication of cores

    • Some Guy

      Intel Fanboy alert! Why pledge your allegiance to a company who doesn’t know you exist or care about you with overpriced cpus?