AMD Radeon RX Vega Benchmark Review: Vega 64 and Vega 56 Tested

Jump To:

3DMark Time Spy – DX12

3DMark Time Spy just recently came out and it is the latest and greatest DirectX 12 benchmark test for gaming PCs running Windows 10. This DirectX 12 Feature Level 11_0 benchmark utilizes a pure DirectX 12 game engine that supports features like asynchronous compute, explicit multi-adapter, and multi-threading! The developers opted to use DirectX 12 Feature Level 11_0 to ensuring wide compatibility with DirectX 11 hardware through DirectX 12 drivers.

3DMark Time Spy

With DirectX 12 on Windows 10, game developers can significantly improve the multi-thread scaling and hardware utilization of their titles to draw more objects, textures and effects for your viewing enjoyment. 3DMark Fire Strike is a great high-end DirectX 11 benchmark test, but doesn’t really show off what new graphics cards can do on a DirectX 12 game title that will have much more going on while you are playing.

3DMark Time Spy Settings

We ran 3DMark Time Spy with the standard settings and got the following results:

In this DX12 benchmark we see the AMD Radeon RX VEGA 64 come in with 7,404 points and the Radeon RX VEGA 56 behind that with 6,713 points.

Print
Jump To:
  • chrisday85

    Ok, here’s some things ticking me off: The Vega 64 is literally twice the gflops, and twice the memory bandwidth of the RX 580. The gap from the Vega 64 to RX 580 should be huge. The GTX 1060 to 1080 may be basically as large Gflops wise, but is minimal memory bandwidth wise. And what do you notice in these benchmarks? What the bloody hell is going on? The Vega is a new architecture, it’s supposed to be better in all sorts of ways. Yet here we see the same architecture generation from Nvidia performing much better in line with the increases. Allow me to demonstrate:

    Cross multiply Nvidia GTX 1060 Gears 4 1080, using the RX 580 and you find the AMD if scaling as well, should be average 157 in the frame rate, before accounting for any leap from the new architecture. What does it turn in? 128. Nvidia is scaling better in the same generation than AMD is in the new one?

    Fallout IV: It should be 125 if it scaled as well as the NVIDIA card. It is instead 112.

    Ghost Recon:

    95 instead of 106

    Battlefield:

    131 instead of 153

    Deus Ex:

    112 instead of 125.

    Grand Theft Auto is the only one it scales a tiny bit better.

    It’s scaling WORSE in DX 12 than it is in DX 11 I might add, do the math.

    I bought the Vega 64 and I have to say I’m disappointed. I’m hoping these beta drivers are the reason, because this is absurd, and I might add, the card gets to 86c unless I turn the fans to “wind turbine” as well. I also seem to be having an issue with Batman Arkham Knight in frame rate, which I’m just going to chalk up to some weird sort of glitch, because it’s nowhere near where benchmarks peg it. This has got to be one of AMD’s most disappointing launches of a new architecture I have seen.

  • Stephen

    test system, 6950x ivy bridge-e? error

    • Nathan Kirsch

      haha, winner! Fixed and thank you.

  • Sean Kumar Sinha

    Was hoping for a card that’d make NVidia push Volta and create a realistic GPU war. Unfortunately, we got cards that compete with stuff that NVidia has had out for over a year and that draw too much power, in comparison. These are good cards, for sure, but they are a year too late. Vega 56 seems like a good option for some 1080P Freesync gaming, though.

  • James Yarno

    Ethereum hash rate?